faq.rst 12 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278
  1. .. _faq:
  2. .. include:: global.rst.inc
  3. Frequently asked questions
  4. ==========================
  5. Can I backup VM disk images?
  6. ----------------------------
  7. Yes, the `deduplication`_ technique used by
  8. |project_name| makes sure only the modified parts of the file are stored.
  9. Also, we have optional simple sparse file support for extract.
  10. Can I backup from multiple servers into a single repository?
  11. ------------------------------------------------------------
  12. Yes, but in order for the deduplication used by |project_name| to work, it
  13. needs to keep a local cache containing checksums of all file
  14. chunks already stored in the repository. This cache is stored in
  15. ``~/.cache/borg/``. If |project_name| detects that a repository has been
  16. modified since the local cache was updated it will need to rebuild
  17. the cache. This rebuild can be quite time consuming.
  18. So, yes it's possible. But it will be most efficient if a single
  19. repository is only modified from one place. Also keep in mind that
  20. |project_name| will keep an exclusive lock on the repository while creating
  21. or deleting archives, which may make *simultaneous* backups fail.
  22. Can I copy or synchronize my repo to another location?
  23. ------------------------------------------------------
  24. Yes, you could just copy all the files. Make sure you do that while no
  25. backup is running. So what you get here is this:
  26. - client machine ---borg create---> repo1
  27. - repo1 ---copy---> repo2
  28. There is no special borg command to do the copying, just use cp or rsync if
  29. you want to do that.
  30. But think about whether that is really what you want. If something goes
  31. wrong in repo1, you will have the same issue in repo2 after the copy.
  32. If you want to have 2 independent backups, it is better to do it like this:
  33. - client machine ---borg create---> repo1
  34. - client machine ---borg create---> repo2
  35. Which file types, attributes, etc. are preserved?
  36. -------------------------------------------------
  37. * Directories
  38. * Regular files
  39. * Hardlinks (considering all files in the same archive)
  40. * Symlinks (stored as symlink, the symlink is not followed)
  41. * Character and block device files
  42. * FIFOs ("named pipes")
  43. * Name
  44. * Contents
  45. * Timestamps in nanosecond precision: mtime, atime, ctime
  46. * IDs of owning user and owning group
  47. * Names of owning user and owning group (if the IDs can be resolved)
  48. * Unix Mode/Permissions (u/g/o permissions, suid, sgid, sticky)
  49. * Extended Attributes (xattrs) on Linux, OS X and FreeBSD
  50. * Access Control Lists (ACL_) on Linux, OS X and FreeBSD
  51. * BSD flags on OS X and FreeBSD
  52. Which file types, attributes, etc. are *not* preserved?
  53. -------------------------------------------------------
  54. * UNIX domain sockets (because it does not make sense - they are
  55. meaningless without the running process that created them and the process
  56. needs to recreate them in any case). So, don't panic if your backup
  57. misses a UDS!
  58. * The precise on-disk representation of the holes in a sparse file.
  59. Archive creation has no special support for sparse files, holes are
  60. backed up as (deduplicated and compressed) runs of zero bytes.
  61. Archive extraction has optional support to extract all-zero chunks as
  62. holes in a sparse file.
  63. * filesystem specific attributes, like ext4 immutable bit, see :issue:`618`.
  64. Why is my backup bigger than with attic? Why doesn't |project_name| do compression by default?
  65. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  66. Attic was rather unflexible when it comes to compression, it always
  67. compressed using zlib level 6 (no way to switch compression off or
  68. adjust the level or algorithm).
  69. |project_name| offers a lot of different compression algorithms and
  70. levels. Which of them is the best for you pretty much depends on your
  71. use case, your data, your hardware -- so you need to do an informed
  72. decision about whether you want to use compression, which algorithm
  73. and which level you want to use. This is why compression defaults to
  74. none.
  75. How can I specify the encryption passphrase programmatically?
  76. -------------------------------------------------------------
  77. The encryption passphrase can be specified programmatically using the
  78. `BORG_PASSPHRASE` environment variable. This is convenient when setting up
  79. automated encrypted backups. Another option is to use
  80. key file based encryption with a blank passphrase. See
  81. :ref:`encrypted_repos` for more details.
  82. .. _password_env:
  83. .. note:: Be careful how you set the environment; using the ``env``
  84. command, a ``system()`` call or using inline shell scripts
  85. might expose the credentials in the process list directly
  86. and they will be readable to all users on a system. Using
  87. ``export`` in a shell script file should be safe, however, as
  88. the environment of a process is `accessible only to that
  89. user
  90. <https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/14000/environment-variable-accessibility-in-linux/14009#14009>`_.
  91. When backing up to remote encrypted repos, is encryption done locally?
  92. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  93. Yes, file and directory metadata and data is locally encrypted, before
  94. leaving the local machine. We do not mean the transport layer encryption
  95. by that, but the data/metadata itself. Transport layer encryption (e.g.
  96. when ssh is used as a transport) applies additionally.
  97. When backing up to remote servers, do I have to trust the remote server?
  98. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  99. Yes and No.
  100. No, as far as data confidentiality is concerned - if you use encryption,
  101. all your files/dirs data and metadata are stored in their encrypted form
  102. into the repository.
  103. Yes, as an attacker with access to the remote server could delete (or
  104. otherwise make unavailable) all your backups.
  105. The borg cache eats way too much disk space, what can I do?
  106. -----------------------------------------------------------
  107. There is a temporary (but maybe long lived) hack to avoid using lots of disk
  108. space for chunks.archive.d (see :issue:`235` for details):
  109. ::
  110. # this assumes you are working with the same user as the backup.
  111. # you can get the REPOID from the "config" file inside the repository.
  112. cd ~/.cache/borg/<REPOID>
  113. rm -rf chunks.archive.d ; touch chunks.archive.d
  114. This deletes all the cached archive chunk indexes and replaces the directory
  115. that kept them with a file, so borg won't be able to store anything "in" there
  116. in future.
  117. This has some pros and cons, though:
  118. - much less disk space needs for ~/.cache/borg.
  119. - chunk cache resyncs will be slower as it will have to transfer chunk usage
  120. metadata for all archives from the repository (which might be slow if your
  121. repo connection is slow) and it will also have to build the hashtables from
  122. that data.
  123. chunk cache resyncs happen e.g. if your repo was written to by another
  124. machine (if you share same backup repo between multiple machines) or if
  125. your local chunks cache was lost somehow.
  126. The long term plan to improve this is called "borgception", see :issue:`474`.
  127. If a backup stops mid-way, does the already-backed-up data stay there?
  128. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  129. Yes, |project_name| supports resuming backups.
  130. During a backup a special checkpoint archive named ``<archive-name>.checkpoint``
  131. is saved every checkpoint interval (the default value for this is 5
  132. minutes) containing all the data backed-up until that point. This means
  133. that at most <checkpoint interval> worth of data needs to be retransmitted
  134. if a backup needs to be restarted.
  135. Once your backup has finished successfully, you can delete all ``*.checkpoint``
  136. archives.
  137. If it crashes with a UnicodeError, what can I do?
  138. -------------------------------------------------
  139. Check if your encoding is set correctly. For most POSIX-like systems, try::
  140. export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 # or similar, important is correct charset
  141. I can't extract non-ascii filenames by giving them on the commandline!?
  142. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  143. This might be due to different ways to represent some characters in unicode
  144. or due to other non-ascii encoding issues.
  145. If you run into that, try this:
  146. - avoid the non-ascii characters on the commandline by e.g. extracting
  147. the parent directory (or even everything)
  148. - mount the repo using FUSE and use some file manager
  149. Can |project_name| add redundancy to the backup data to deal with hardware malfunction?
  150. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  151. No, it can't. While that at first sounds like a good idea to defend against
  152. some defect HDD sectors or SSD flash blocks, dealing with this in a
  153. reliable way needs a lot of low-level storage layout information and
  154. control which we do not have (and also can't get, even if we wanted).
  155. So, if you need that, consider RAID or a filesystem that offers redundant
  156. storage or just make backups to different locations / different hardware.
  157. See also `ticket 225 <https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/225>`_.
  158. Can |project_name| verify data integrity of a backup archive?
  159. -------------------------------------------------------------
  160. Yes, if you want to detect accidental data damage (like bit rot), use the
  161. ``check`` operation. It will notice corruption using CRCs and hashes.
  162. If you want to be able to detect malicious tampering also, use a encrypted
  163. repo. It will then be able to check using CRCs and HMACs.
  164. .. _a_status_oddity:
  165. I am seeing 'A' (added) status for a unchanged file!?
  166. -----------------------------------------------------
  167. The files cache is used to determine whether |project_name| already
  168. "knows" / has backed up a file and if so, to skip the file from
  169. chunking. It does intentionally *not* contain files that:
  170. - have >= 10 as "entry age" (|project_name| has not seen this file for a while)
  171. - have a modification time (mtime) same as the newest mtime in the created
  172. archive
  173. So, if you see an 'A' status for unchanged file(s), they are likely the files
  174. with the most recent mtime in that archive.
  175. This is expected: it is to avoid data loss with files that are backed up from
  176. a snapshot and that are immediately changed after the snapshot (but within
  177. mtime granularity time, so the mtime would not change). Without the code that
  178. removes these files from the files cache, the change that happened right after
  179. the snapshot would not be contained in the next backup as |project_name| would
  180. think the file is unchanged.
  181. This does not affect deduplication, the file will be chunked, but as the chunks
  182. will often be the same and already stored in the repo (except in the above
  183. mentioned rare condition), it will just re-use them as usual and not store new
  184. data chunks.
  185. Since only the files cache is used in the display of files status,
  186. those files are reported as being added when, really, chunks are
  187. already used.
  188. Why was Borg forked from Attic?
  189. -------------------------------
  190. Borg was created in May 2015 in response to the difficulty of getting new
  191. code or larger changes incorporated into Attic and establishing a bigger
  192. developer community / more open development.
  193. More details can be found in `ticket 217
  194. <https://github.com/jborg/attic/issues/217>`_ that led to the fork.
  195. Borg intends to be:
  196. * simple:
  197. * as simple as possible, but no simpler
  198. * do the right thing by default, but offer options
  199. * open:
  200. * welcome feature requests
  201. * accept pull requests of good quality and coding style
  202. * give feedback on PRs that can't be accepted "as is"
  203. * discuss openly, don't work in the dark
  204. * changing:
  205. * Borg is not compatible with Attic
  206. * do not break compatibility accidentally, without a good reason
  207. or without warning. allow compatibility breaking for other cases.
  208. * if major version number changes, it may have incompatible changes