|
@@ -297,22 +297,185 @@ More on how this helps security in :ref:`security_structural_auth`.
|
|
|
The manifest
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
-The manifest is an object with an all-zero key that references all the
|
|
|
-archives. It contains:
|
|
|
+The manifest is the root of the object hierarchy. It references
|
|
|
+all archives in a repository, and thus all data in it.
|
|
|
+Since no object references it, it cannot be stored under its ID key.
|
|
|
+Instead, the manifest has a fixed all-zero key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-* Manifest version
|
|
|
-* A list of archive infos
|
|
|
-* timestamp
|
|
|
-* config
|
|
|
+The manifest is rewritten each time an archive is created, deleted,
|
|
|
+or modified. It looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Each archive info contains:
|
|
|
+.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ {
|
|
|
+ b'version': 1,
|
|
|
+ b'timestamp': b'2017-05-05T12:42:23.042864',
|
|
|
+ b'item_keys': [b'acl_access', b'acl_default', ...],
|
|
|
+ b'config': {},
|
|
|
+ b'archives': {
|
|
|
+ b'2017-05-05-system-backup': {
|
|
|
+ b'id': b'<32 byte binary object ID>',
|
|
|
+ b'time': b'2017-05-05T12:42:22.942864',
|
|
|
+ },
|
|
|
+ },
|
|
|
+ b'tam': ...,
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The *version* field can be either 1 or 2. The versions differ in the
|
|
|
+way feature flags are handled, described below.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The *timestamp* field is used to avoid logical replay attacks where
|
|
|
+the server just resets the repository to a previous state.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*item_keys* is a list containing all Item_ keys that may be encountered in
|
|
|
+the repository. It is used by *borg check*, which verifies that all keys
|
|
|
+in all items are a subset of these keys. Thus, an older version of *borg check*
|
|
|
+supporting this mechanism can correctly detect keys introduced in later versions.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The *tam* key is part of the :ref:`tertiary authentication mechanism <tam_description>`
|
|
|
+(formerly known as "tertiary authentication for metadata") and authenticates
|
|
|
+the manifest, since an ID check is not possible.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*config* is a general-purpose location for additional metadata. All versions
|
|
|
+of Borg preserve its contents (it may have been a better place for *item_keys*,
|
|
|
+which is not preserved by unaware Borg versions, releases predating 1.0.4).
|
|
|
|
|
|
-* name
|
|
|
-* id
|
|
|
-* time
|
|
|
+Feature flags
|
|
|
++++++++++++++
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Feature flags are used to add features to data structures without causing
|
|
|
+corruption if older versions are used to access or modify them. The main issues
|
|
|
+to consider for a feature flag oriented design are flag granularity,
|
|
|
+flag storage, and cache_ invalidation.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Feature flags are divided in approximately three categories, detailed below.
|
|
|
+Due to the nature of ID-based deduplication, write (i.e. creating archives) and
|
|
|
+read access are not symmetric; it is possible to create archives referencing
|
|
|
+chunks that are not readable with the current feature set. The third
|
|
|
+category are operations that require accurate reference counts, for example
|
|
|
+archive deletion and check.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As the manifest is always updated and always read, it is the ideal place to store
|
|
|
+feature flags, comparable to the super-block of a file system. The only problem
|
|
|
+is to recover from a lost manifest, i.e. how is it possible to detect which feature
|
|
|
+flags are enabled, if there is no manifest to tell. This issue is left open at this time,
|
|
|
+but is not expected to be a major hurdle; it doesn't have to be handled efficiently, it just
|
|
|
+needs to be handled.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Lastly, cache_ invalidation is handled by noting which feature
|
|
|
+flags were and which were not understood while manipulating a cache.
|
|
|
+This allows to detect whether the cache needs to be invalidated,
|
|
|
+i.e. rebuilt from scratch. See `Cache feature flags`_ below.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The *config* key stores the feature flags enabled on a repository:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.. code-block:: python
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ config = {
|
|
|
+ b'feature_flags': {
|
|
|
+ b'read': {
|
|
|
+ b'mandatory': [b'some_feature'],
|
|
|
+ },
|
|
|
+ b'check': {
|
|
|
+ b'mandatory': [b'other_feature'],
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ b'write': ...,
|
|
|
+ b'delete': ...
|
|
|
+ },
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
|
|
-It is the last object stored, in the last segment, and is replaced
|
|
|
-each time an archive is added, modified or deleted.
|
|
|
+The top-level distinction for feature flags is the operation the client intends
|
|
|
+to perform,
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+| the *read* operation includes extraction and listing of archives,
|
|
|
+| the *write* operation includes creating new archives,
|
|
|
+| the *delete* (archives) operation,
|
|
|
+| the *check* operation requires full understanding of everything in the repository.
|
|
|
+|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+These are weakly set-ordered; *check* will include everything required for *delete*,
|
|
|
+*delete* will likely include *write* and *read*. However, *read* may require more
|
|
|
+features than *write* (due to ID-based deduplication, *write* does not necessarily
|
|
|
+require reading/understanding repository contents).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Each operation can contain several sets of feature flags. Only one set,
|
|
|
+the *mandatory* set is currently defined.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Upon reading the manifest, the Borg client has already determined which operation
|
|
|
+should be performed. If feature flags are found in the manifest, the set
|
|
|
+of feature flags supported by the client is compared to the mandatory set
|
|
|
+found in the manifest. If any unsupported flags are found (i.e. the mandatory set is
|
|
|
+not a subset of the features supported by the Borg client used), the operation
|
|
|
+is aborted with a *MandatoryFeatureUnsupported* error:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Unsupported repository feature(s) {'some_feature'}. A newer version of borg is required to access this repository.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Older Borg releases do not have this concept and do not perform feature flags checks.
|
|
|
+These can be locked out with manifest version 2. Thus, the only difference between
|
|
|
+manifest versions 1 and 2 is that the latter is only accepted by Borg releases
|
|
|
+implementing feature flags.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Therefore, as soon as any mandatory feature flag is enabled in a repository,
|
|
|
+the manifest version must be switched to version 2 in order to lock out all
|
|
|
+Borg releases unaware of feature flags.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.. _Cache feature flags:
|
|
|
+.. rubric:: Cache feature flags
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+`The cache`_ does not have its separate set of feature flags. Instead, Borg stores
|
|
|
+which flags were used to create or modify a cache.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+All mandatory manifest features from all operations are gathered in one set.
|
|
|
+Then, two sets of features are computed;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- those features that are supported by the client and mandated by the manifest
|
|
|
+ are added to the *mandatory_features* set,
|
|
|
+- the *ignored_features* set comprised of those features mandated by the manifest,
|
|
|
+ but not supported by the client.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Because the client previously checked compliance with the mandatory set of features
|
|
|
+required for the particular operation it is executing, the *mandatory_features* set
|
|
|
+will contain all necessary features required for using the cache safely.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Conversely, the *ignored_features* set contains only those features which were not
|
|
|
+relevant to operating the cache. Otherwise, the client would not pass the feature
|
|
|
+set test against the manifest.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+When opening a cache and the *mandatory_features* set is not a subset of the features
|
|
|
+supported by the client, the cache is wiped out and rebuilt,
|
|
|
+since a client not supporting a mandatory feature that the cache was built with
|
|
|
+would be unable to update it correctly.
|
|
|
+The assumption behind this behaviour is that any of the unsupported features could have
|
|
|
+been reflected in the cache and there is no way for the client to discern whether
|
|
|
+that is the case.
|
|
|
+Meanwhile, it may not be practical for every feature to have clients using it track
|
|
|
+whether the feature had an impact on the cache.
|
|
|
+Therefore, the cache is wiped.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+When opening a cache and the intersection of *ignored_features* and the features
|
|
|
+supported by the client contains any elements, i.e. the client possesses features
|
|
|
+that the previous client did not have and those new features are enabled in the repository,
|
|
|
+the cache is wiped out and rebuilt.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+While the former condition likely requires no tweaks, the latter condition is formulated
|
|
|
+in an especially conservative way to play it safe. It seems likely that specific features
|
|
|
+might be exempted from the latter condition.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.. rubric:: Defined feature flags
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Currently no feature flags are defined.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+From currently planned features, some examples follow,
|
|
|
+these may/may not be implemented and purely serve as examples.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- A mandatory *read* feature could be using a different encryption scheme (e.g. session keys).
|
|
|
+ This may not be mandatory for the *write* operation - reading data is not strictly required for
|
|
|
+ creating an archive.
|
|
|
+- Any additions to the way chunks are referenced (e.g. to support larger archives) would
|
|
|
+ become a mandatory *delete* and *check* feature; *delete* implies knowing correct
|
|
|
+ reference counts, so all object references need to be understood. *check* must
|
|
|
+ discover the entire object graph as well, otherwise the "orphan chunks check"
|
|
|
+ could delete data still in use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _archive:
|
|
|
|